Flexo Machine Installation at PawPack Packaging - LISHG
Pet Food & Pet Care Packaging
LISHG · Proof
P
PawPack Packaging
Customer reference
ThailandPet Food & Pet Care Packaging

Reducing Waste and Improving Print Quality for Pet Food Packaging Manufacturer

PawPack Packaging (Thailand) · Pet Food & Pet Care Packaging. Challenge: The customer needed to improve the efficiency and consistency of dog food and cat food packaging printing while managing. Result: +25% · -42% · 16 months.

+25%
Speed
-42%
Waste
16 months
ROI
Narrative
Challenge → Solution → Result

Customer Success Story · Thailand · Pet Food Packaging

35% more output. Half the changeover time. Export-ready pet packaging.

How a growing converter turned high-mix dog and cat food packaging into a more stable, more profitable print operation—without trading shelf appeal for speed.

Customer

PawPack Packaging Co., Ltd. (illustrative)

Industry

Pet food flexible packaging

Focus

Quality · waste · changeovers

On the retail shelf, a dog food bag has a few seconds to earn trust. The photograph has to look alive. The brand color has to match last month's shipment. The nutritional panel has to stay crisp. For converters serving premium pet brands, that standard is non-negotiable—and it has to hold when SKUs multiply and runs get shorter.

That was the tension inside PawPack Packaging Co., Ltd., a Thailand-based flexible packaging manufacturer (illustrative customer profile) producing bags and pouches for regional and export pet food labels. Growth was welcome. The print floor was feeling the strain.

Outcome

+35% productivity · −42% waste · −50% changeover time

What changed

Workflow redesign + sample-led process, not equipment-only

Payback

Approx. 16 months through efficiency and lower operating cost

The pressure

Four forces pulling the press floor in opposite directions

Brand owners wanted richer graphics. Sales wanted more SKUs. Finance wanted less waste. Production wanted speed. On BOPP, PET, PE, and laminated webs, those goals rarely move together unless the process is rebuilt around them.

01

Shelf-critical graphics

Pet photography, brand colors, ingredient lists, QR codes, and barcodes—any drift shows up as a customer complaint.

02

SKU explosion

Sizes, flavors, seasonal launches, and private labels meant artwork changes that ate shifts and burned film on setup.

03

Speed vs. register

Pushing meters per minute often cost registration stability—especially on stretch-sensitive and laminated structures.

04

Cost of waste

Substrates and specialty inks kept rising. Startup waste was no longer a soft cost—it was a margin problem.

“We were winning more brands, then spending half the night getting the next job into register. The problem wasn't ambition—it was the gap between what the artwork demanded and what the floor could repeat.”

— Production Manager, PawPack Packaging (illustrative attribution)

Evidence on film

What the samples had to prove

Before commercial production, the team printed on the customer's real materials—checking color hold, adhesion, and how the print would behave after lamination and pouch making.

Dog food bag packaging print sample

Dog food bags

Large panels · brand color · fine text

Cat food pouch packaging print sample

Cat food pouches

Retail detail · laminated structures

Pet treat packaging print sample

Pet treats

Short-run color · promo artwork

Laminated rollstock print sample

Rollstock

Downstream lamination readiness

How they fixed it

A production redesign—not a machine brochure moment

LISHG sat with PawPack's technical team and mapped the real work: bag constructions, artwork complexity, substrate mix, and how jobs moved from plate room to pouch line. The press choice—the King Series 8 Color High Performance CI Flexo—was the foundation, not the entire story.

Together they rebuilt changeovers around quicker sleeve work and saved job settings, so operators could leave one flavor pack and enter the next without re-earning registration from scratch. They tightened web stability so startup waste fell and downstream lamination stopped inheriting print-side problems. And they validated the process on live customer materials—plates, anilox, inks, drying, tension, adhesion, sealing, scratch—before the first commercial order.

The result on the shelf was quieter but more important: packs that looked intentional, runs that finished on time, and a floor that could say yes to short-run brand work without panic.

Before → After

What the floor felt like afterward

Before

· Long setups between flavor and private-label jobs

· Registration recovery consuming film and overtime

· Speed limited by fear of graphic drift

· Export brand audits harder to face with confidence

After

· Changeovers roughly half as long

· Faster path to stable register; less startup scrap

· Higher daily output without giving up shelf quality

· Stronger position for domestic and export brand work

Measured results

Numbers the business could take to the board

+35%

Productivity

−42%

Material waste

−50%

Changeover

±0.08

mm register

16 mo

Approx. ROI

Today the plant runs premium pet packaging for domestic and export brands with more predictable quality, fewer late nights on setup, and a clearer path to take on the next SKU wave.

Why it worked

Partnership beat installation

The project succeeded because print quality, changeover speed, and waste were treated as one system—application analysis, sample testing, process settings, and operator training moved together. That is how PawPack strengthened its position in a competitive pet packaging market while leaving room to grow.

FAQ

Questions converters usually ask

What business results did this project deliver?

In this illustrative success story: +35% productivity, −42% material waste, −50% changeover time, registration around ±0.08 mm, and roughly 16-month payback from efficiency and lower operating cost.

Why is print consistency so hard on pet food packaging?

Premium packs combine photography, brand color, small regulatory text, and codes on films that may stretch or laminate later. Consistency is a process problem as much as a press problem.

Which press supported this line?

The King Series 8 Color High Performance CI Flexo—selected after matching substrates, artwork, and workflow, then validated with sample printing.

Facing the same tension on your pet packaging line?

Tell us about your bag formats, film mix, and how often jobs change. We will map a practical path—process first, press second.

Talk to engineering AI Press Selector

Continue: Pet packaging overview · Buyer guide · King Series

02

Customer voice

“The customer needed to improve the efficiency and consistency of dog food and cat food packaging printing while managing a growing number of SKUs. Frequent artwork changes caused long setup times and high material waste, while maintaining consistent color reproduction and precise registration on BOPP, PET, and PE packaging films remained challenging. The customer required a printing solution that could deliver premium-quality pet food packaging with higher productivity, lower waste, and stable performance for both short-run customized orders and large-volume production”
— PawPack Packaging
03

Recommended machine logic

Why this machine

King Series

Based on your profile: Pet Food & Pet Care Packaging · Film, BOPP, PET, PE · 1000–1300mm · 350m/min

servo gear CI flexo
Process match

King Series is the strongest fit for Pet Food & Pet Care Packaging because Best fit when the plant runs high-speed film jobs and needs reliable register control, fast ramp-up, and strong production stability. At your target speed of 350m/min, this platform keeps register stable, startup waste low, and changeovers practical for repeat jobs.

Material fit

You selected Film, BOPP, PET, PE. King Series is engineered for thin film, BOPP, PET, PE. Core substrate window: thin film, BOPP, PET, PE. This reduces tension surprises and ink-transfer issues on your primary material.

Production envelope

Width target 1000–1300mm and speed 350m/min sit inside the King Series envelope (1000-1300mm, 300m/min). Budget Mid to high range and High automation align with very high-automation workflows at this output level.

Strengths & tradeoffs

Key advantages: Servo gear precision; low startup waste; strong register at speed. Tradeoff to confirm: Higher initial investment than Master or Honor, and not the primary choice for FFS heavy-duty sacks. If your mix shifts toward ultra-thin film at 400–500 m/min, compare with another LISHG line before finalizing.

Servo gear precisionlow startup wastestrong register at speed

Pick press family, then sub-series model.

Compare all
VS
Materials
M1
N/A
M2
N/A
Width range
M1
1600 mm
M2
1240 mm
Speed target
M1
500 m/min
M2
350-450m/min
Budget range
M1
mid-high
M2
high
Recommended press
King Series 6 Color Full Servo Gearless CI Flexographic Printing Machine for Flexible Films

Best fit when the plant runs high-speed film jobs and needs reliable register control, fast ramp-up, and strong production stability.

Model comparison

Side-by-side spec comparison

MasterKing
Compare Master vs King
Inquiry

Discuss a similar project

Share your substrate, width, and speed targets with our engineering team.

Contact Desk